<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><!-- generator=Zoho Sites --><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><atom:link href="https://www.nownextlater.ai/Insights/tag/react/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title>Now Next Later AI - Blog #ReAct</title><description>Now Next Later AI - Blog #ReAct</description><link>https://www.nownextlater.ai/Insights/tag/react</link><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 21:23:14 +1100</lastBuildDate><generator>http://zoho.com/sites/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Teaching AI to Think Clearly and Act Accordingly: ReAct]]></title><link>https://www.nownextlater.ai/Insights/post/teaching-ai-to-think-clearly-and-act-accordingly-react</link><description><![CDATA[LLMs struggle with logical reasoning and decision-making when tackling complex real-world problems. Researchers propose an approach called ReAct that interleaves reasoning steps with actions to address this accuracy problem.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_dj8zVKaSSC2Crlv2jhLZgQ" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_qqoyNkmVTKi_QOxm7xSRnw" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_Hi1ywYrhRmKFlK5yjqnOdw" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_bLeCNGIfNht0R32uAi7FcA" data-element-type="image" class="zpelement zpelem-image "><style> @media (min-width: 992px) { [data-element-id="elm_bLeCNGIfNht0R32uAi7FcA"] .zpimage-container figure img { width: 1090px ; height: 853.38px ; } } @media (max-width: 991px) and (min-width: 768px) { [data-element-id="elm_bLeCNGIfNht0R32uAi7FcA"] .zpimage-container figure img { width:723px ; height:566.05px ; } } @media (max-width: 767px) { [data-element-id="elm_bLeCNGIfNht0R32uAi7FcA"] .zpimage-container figure img { width:415px ; height:324.91px ; } } [data-element-id="elm_bLeCNGIfNht0R32uAi7FcA"].zpelem-image { border-radius:1px; } </style><div data-caption-color="" data-size-tablet="" data-size-mobile="" data-align="center" data-tablet-image-separate="false" data-mobile-image-separate="false" class="zpimage-container zpimage-align-center zpimage-size-fit zpimage-tablet-fallback-fit zpimage-mobile-fallback-fit hb-lightbox " data-lightbox-options="
                type:fullscreen,
                theme:dark"><figure role="none" class="zpimage-data-ref"><span class="zpimage-anchor" role="link" tabindex="0" aria-label="Open Lightbox" style="cursor:pointer;"><picture><img class="zpimage zpimage-style-none zpimage-space-none " src="/Screenshot%202023-08-09%20at%2010.47.10%20am.png" width="415" height="324.91" loading="lazy" size="fit" alt="Comparison of 4 prompting methods" data-lightbox="true"/></picture></span></figure></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_u9bjeGCwQoutoQmXokkL_A" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style> [data-element-id="elm_u9bjeGCwQoutoQmXokkL_A"].zpelem-text { border-radius:1px; } </style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left " data-editor="true"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p>Large AI models like GPT-4 and Claude have shown impressive language skills. But they struggle with logical reasoning and decision-making when tackling complex real-world problems. Their impressive generated text too often contains factual mistakes or irrational logic.</p><p><br></p><p>Researchers from Princeton and Google propose an approach called ReAct that interleaves reasoning steps with actions to address this accuracy problem. It works like this:</p><ul><li>The AI takes a real-world action like searching Wikipedia for facts relevant to answering a question.</li><li>It then reasons about those facts, analyzing if and how they help answer the question.</li><li>Based on gaps in its reasoning, it decides the next external action to take to fill those gaps.</li><li>And so on until it answers the question.</li></ul><p><br></p><p>The key is the model must justify each action by reasoning over concrete evidence from the external world. This acts as a check against hallucinated facts or fallacious logic.</p><p><br></p><p>Experiments showed ReAct reduced factual mistakes in question answering by 14% compared to pure reasoning models. The external grounding forces more rational justification. In interactive games, mixing internal planning and external actions achieved over 30% higher success rates than acting alone without reasoning. The researchers believe this is a promising path to accurate and robust AI. Rather than blindly trusting an AI system's internally generated text, ReAct uses external data and actions to validate each reasoning step.</p><p><br></p><p>For business leaders, ReAct demonstrates the value of integrating different skills - natural language, logical reasoning, acting in the world - to overcome limitations of any single method. Just as humans leverage both internal and external knowledge.</p><p><br></p><p>As models advance, hybrid techniques like ReAct may be key to accurate reasoning and decision-making. Combining neural network strengths with classical methods like search and symbolic logic mitigates weaknesses.</p><p><br></p><p>The end goal is AI that not only speaks convincingly but also truly understands the world and acts accordingly. ReAct offers a template to get there.</p></div></div><p><br></p><p>Source:</p><p><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629" title="arxiv" rel="">arxiv</a><br></p><p></p></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div> ]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:02:14 +1000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>